The Euro 2012 Funky Tie Breaker Rules
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on June 16th, 2012
So here’s how things stood before today’s Group A games (Russia vs Greece, Poland vs Czech Republic):
Russia 4pts
Czech Republic: 3pts
Poland 2pts
Greece 1pt
(win = 3pts, draw = 1pt)
Now, Greece scored a late first half goal against Russia, and led 1-0. So Czech Republic and Poland were in the interesting position of having to score to win and advance. If they played to a draw, then, according to ESPN, Russia would win the group and Greece would also advance. This is due to a bizarre tiebreaker rule that Euro 2012 has in place. If Czech-Poland was a draw, and Greece beat Russia 1-0, then Russia, Czech Republic, and Greece would each have 4 points. Then, the rule is that you look at how these three teams did in points against each other – ie, the results vs Poland are thrown out – in which case you’d see that Russia trounced Czech Republic (4-1) and lost to Greece (1-0), Greece lost to Czech Republic (2-1), making the final hypothetical standings:
Russia: 3 pts 4 goals for, 1 goal against
Greece: 3 pts: 2 goals for, 2 goals against
Czech Republic: 3 pts: 3 goals for, 5 goals against
so Russia and Greece would go through based on goal differential (cause it’s a 3 way tie).
So Poland and Czech Republic, once Greece had the lead, had to go for broke – must win to advance. And yet, at the same time, Czech Republic couldn’t just go crazy, because if Russia managed to pull back and draw with Greece, then Czech Republic would be good with a draw of their own! This is why the games are played simultaneously on the last day, by the way!
Anyway, Czech Republic scored against Poland, and now Russia was left out in the cold. I found it interesting that Russia could go from winning the group, with the team they had just lost to (Greece) taking second, to finishing third just because Czech Republic scored a goal – but it’s a product of the funky tie-breaker system used by the Euro Cup.
-KD
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
If you'd like to make a donation, I always appreciate it:
I'm also a member of the Amazon.com Affiliate program. -
Recent Posts
- Let’s Get Ready to RumbleOn
- Senomyx: An Activist Campaign
- RumbleON – Disrupting the Online Used Motorcycle Market
- $XIV Volpocalypse – A Sea of Disinformation and Misunderstanding
- Form Holdings – Blockchain is Icing on the Cake
- Let’s Talk About Arbitrage – Bitcoin Futures Edition
- WYNN Q3 2017 Conference Call Tidbits
- Healthcare Will be Screwed Until We Stop Accepting Excuses
- No Surrender
- Fractal Market Behavior: Silver Edition
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007