I Demand That Las Vegas Sands Change Their Name!
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on January 30th, 2013
This isn’t the first time I’ve made this point, but I figured I’d bring it up again, for those just unaware at how incredibly NOT-Las-Vegas Las Vegas Sands ($LVS – no positions) is. Here’s a little spreadsheet I put together with numbers from LVS’s 8-k earnings report just filed:
(disclosure: data manually compiled from the 8-k: errors are possible)
Notice that Las Vegas represents 3% of the operating income, and 5% of the adjusted property EBITDA. Pfooey. Las Vegas Sands my ass…
There is another thing that I always find amazing (even though, again, I’ve written about it before) – LVS does more casino revenue in Bethlehem, PA than they do in Las Vegas. Amazing. On a related note, I broke out the revenues for each property by casino revenue and total revenue:
Notice that Las Vegas is the only property (properties: Venetian and Palazzo) where they derive a significant portion of their revenues from NON-casino sources (then again, this is largely because the Vegas casino numbers are so weak)…
Finally, I ran through the same “how was their gambling luck” exercise that I’ve done in the past with WYNN, and came up with a rough estimate of negative 8c/share of EPS impact for LVS due to “bad luck” in the form of lower than expected hold percentage. (Rolling Chip variation = (Rolling Chip Volume) x (Rolling Chip Win % – Expected Rolling Chip win %), and I used the midpoint of the expected range)
Someone mentioned to me that the company said that “adjusted” EPS were 10c higher than reported, so my 8c estimate, which ignored slot hold and non-rolling chip win % was pretty close.
Related: LVS Q4 2012 8-k
Las Vegas Sands Should Change Its Name
Las Vegas Sands Earnings Beat Was Due to Good Luck
WYNN Gets Unlucky in The Quarter
WYNN Gets Lucky In the Quarter
-KD
disclosure: no positions in $LVS, $WYNN
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
If you'd like to make a donation, I always appreciate it:
I'm also a member of the Amazon.com Affiliate program. -
Recent Posts
- Senate Subcommittee Hearings on Apple’s Taxes – Grandstanding Dbags
- HomeBrew Batch #29 – Mustard Brown Ale
- The Most Exciting 8 Seconds of My Night
- The Kid’s Still Got It
- Is Anyone Surprised That Fish McBites Suck?
- Poker and Trading – Birds of a Feather
- Matt Kemp: Respect
- The Difference Between Women and Men: Dog Poop Edition
- You Can Not Make This Stuff Up
- Cut Punters – Jon Stewarts Skewers Congress on the Sequester
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-


