Herbalife Updates and Clarifies Its Statement of Compensation
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on February 7th, 2013
Herbalife ($HLF – NO POSITIONS) has updated its Statement of Compensation which gives a quick 2 page summary of their business opportunities, and how much participants can expect to make. While I’ve generally been disappointed in the Company’s “defenses” thus far in terms of rebutting Bill Ackman’s accusations, I think this is the best thing they’ve put out thus far. I think they go out of their way to explain that the business opportunity is not a get rich quick scheme, and that they do a good job explaining the breakdown of the numbers.
I have a few beefs with the numbers, though: First off, HLF cites the Lieberman report that says that 73% of distributors join to receive wholesale pricing on product for themselves and their family:
The majority (73%) primarily join us to receive a wholesale price on products they and their families enjoy…
Then, though, HLF states:
The majority of Herbalife’s independent Distributors (71%) have not sponsored another Distributor and are therefore “single-level” Distributors. Single-level Distributors benefit from buying Herbalife products at a preferred price for their consumption and that of their families, and for many this is the only benefit they seek.
I am somewhat confused by the difference between the 71% and the 73% numbers.
More importantly, Herbalife has updated the table that shows the average compensation for their sales leaders.
Let’s talk about this chart. They clearly disclose:
“The compensation chart below indicates that 434,125 Distributors (88%) received no payments from Herbalife during 2012. However, this chart does not include amounts earned by Distributors on their sales of Herbalife products to others.”
I’m glad they disclosed it, because otherwise you’d never figure that out by looking at the chart. To get the 434,125 number, you have to take the 351,065 single level distributors, add the 60,333 non-sales leaders with a downline, but then subtract out the 2,466 of these who DID get paid by Herbalife, then add in 25,193 non-earning sales leaders with a downline from the bottom table. Bingo: 434,125.
My biggest beef, though, is with number on the lower right hand corner of the chart: that $4,485 “Average Gross Payments” category for the “Sales Leaders With a Downline” Category is almost entirely meaningless in illustrating any sort of expectations for new business members. First of all, it’s clearly disclosed that this entire category represents 17% of Herbalife distributors. The problem, though, is that within this category, the “average” gets massively skewed by those tiny percentages of huge earners at the top. While the rest of this document seems to be shedding light on the compensation structure in a good way – better than the company has ever done before – this number still serves to obfuscate the realities.
It’s easy for you to build a little spreadsheet and calculate the total payment for each earnings bucket in HLF’s breakdown. Then, you can calculate cumulative earnings for certain cumulative percentages of the “Sales Leaders With A Downline” category. I did exactly that, and it looks like this:
Note that the cumulative average numbers are off slightly ($4,480 vs $4,485) due to rounding. So let’s look at the last two columns: (here, I’ll give you that data “zoomed” in so you don’t have to squint)
You can see that the bottom 94.8% of “all sales leaders with a downline” received an average of $695 from Herbalife (not including any money they made from selling Herbalife products to others at a markup). 30.6% of sales leaders with a downline received no payments from Herbalife, and 91.7% received an average of $482 from Herbalife.
If Herbalife is interested in being as transparent as possible, they should remove the $4,485 “average” for this entire category, as it bears no reflection of what sales leaders with a downline should have any expectation of earning.
Herbalife Statement of Compensation
-KD
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
If you'd like to make a donation, I always appreciate it:
I'm also a member of the Amazon.com Affiliate program. -
Recent Posts
- The Kid’s Still Got It
- Is Anyone Surprised That Fish McBites Suck?
- Poker and Trading – Birds of a Feather
- Matt Kemp: Respect
- The Difference Between Women and Men: Dog Poop Edition
- You Can Not Make This Stuff Up
- Cut Punters – Jon Stewarts Skewers Congress on the Sequester
- A Classic Homebrew Error: Forgot To Add Priming Sugar!
- WYNN Q1 2013 Earnings Call Tidbits
- Why Won’t Bernanke Be at Jackson Hole?
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-


