Five of the Biggest ETF Myths
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on March 23rd, 2011
1) Myth: “When I buy an ETF, the ETF Trust has to go out and buy the underlying portfolio/commodity/etc“
Truth: When you buy an ETF, the ETF does not take your money and go out and buy their underlying portfolio with it. You buy from someone in the marketplace. This is true no matter what ETF you’re talking about – SPY, QQQQ, GLD, SLV, PSLV, IWM, etc.
When you buy IBM stock, IBM doesn’t get your money, and when you buy SPY, the SPY Trust doesn’t get your money. The person who sells you the security gets the money. (caveat – unless you are participating in a secondary offering)
2) Myth: “ETFs are too hard to understand.“
Truth: Most ETFs are not very complex, devious, or hard to understand. Don’t be afraid to pick up a prospectus – they are all extremely detailed and thorough about explaining how the product works, and most of the ETF providers have simplified explanations with examples on their websites.
Herb Greenberg wrote last fall:
“I can’t stress the complexity of the structure. If the very nature of these “creation units” is beyond the comprehension of most investors the actual mechanics of ETFs involve an even far more complex matrix of transactions.”
On the contrary: it’s incredibly simple, as I explained:
One of the great things about ETFs is that they can be created and redeemed. This means that “authorized participants” (read: big broker dealers) can take a basket containing the underlying stocks of the ETF, in specific weights, deliver them to the ETF trust and receive the ETF shares – that’s called creating. They can also do the opposite: deliver the ETF itself to the trust, and receive the underlying basket of individual stocks – that’s called redeeming.
You take a basket of stocks and give it to the Trust – they give you the ETF. Or, you take the ETF and give it to the trust – they give you the basket of stocks. WTF is complex about that?
3) Myth: “Arbitrageurs are trading ETFs and that’s bad for me.”
Truth: Arbs are your friend – you want the ETF to track its underlying benchmark – and the creation/redemption mechanism allows arbs in The Market to make that happen
If “the market” is lacking SPY sellers, and the price of SPY rises so that it is in excess of it’s NAV (net asset value) there are arbitrageurs standing by ready to short you shares of SPY while they simultaneously buy the underlying basket of SPY components as a hedge. Since they are selling SPY “rich” to it’s fair value, they will make a profit when they eventually collapse their position. How do they collapse it? Well, they take their long basket of SPY component stocks and “create” SPY by delivering the individual stocks to the trust, receive newly created SPY, and use that to cover their SPY short position. Voila – they’re now flat, and the SPY’s assets have increased, as have the shares outstanding.
Repeat after me: PSLV’s 20% premium to NAV is NOT an indication of supply shortages in the silver market. PSLV’s 20% premium is NOT an indication of the true cost of “physical” silver. Seriously, folks, use your heads. PSLV is a closed end fund without any means to arbitrage price discrepancies. That’s it – that’s pretty much all you need to know. There’s no way for traders to create more shares by delivering silver bullion to the trust (like SLV’s creation process), and there’s no borrow available for traders to short PSLV when it gets away from its Net Asset Value.
The Market can’t do anything about the overpricing!
5) Myth: “Ultra ETFs don’t do what they are supposed to do – I looked at a 2 year chart of XLF (financial ETF) and SKF (ultrashort financial ETF) and they were both down over the period!“
Truth: Most Ultra-Etfs do a very good job of their exact stated goal, which is one day leveraged performance relative to the underlying basket. It’s a mathematical truth that compounded daily returns do not equal compounded long term returns, which is why SKF can return -200% of XLF on a daily basis as designed, and yet not return -200% of XLF on a longer term basis.
Related reading:
Misinterpreting PSLV’s Premium
ETF Lesson Part II – No, GLD is not Overdue to Buy 200 Tonnes of Gold
ETF Lesson Part III – Why is GLD So Hard For People To Understand?
ETF Lesson Part IV and the Clarification Post
-KD
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
If you'd like to make a donation, I always appreciate it:
I'm also a member of the Amazon.com Affiliate program. -
Recent Posts
- Kmart Viral Video – Big Gas Savings
- Amazon – A Logistics Story
- Senate Subcommittee Hearings on Apple’s Taxes – Grandstanding Dbags
- HomeBrew Batch #29 – Mustard Brown Ale
- The Most Exciting 8 Seconds of My Night
- The Kid’s Still Got It
- Is Anyone Surprised That Fish McBites Suck?
- Poker and Trading – Birds of a Feather
- Matt Kemp: Respect
- The Difference Between Women and Men: Dog Poop Edition
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-