Either Sino Forest Is Completely Full of Crap, or I Am Missing Something
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on August 28th, 2011
I was actually short Sino-Forest ($SNOFF) coming into Friday. I remarked to a few friends of mine that I guessed it was probably a once in a lifetime event that I would be short a stock that would drop 70% in a single day, and it was too bad I had a minimal position, but it’s still good to be on the right side of a trade like this. I covered my position midday, and actually bid for stock late in the day. I didn’t get hit, and the stock rallied 15% or so from my “non”-level. I was almost disappointed, in a way. Why did I bid for stock? Because again, I thought that the OSC’s announcement that they were suspending trading of Sino-Forest might be overdone. The OSC said that they had evidence of irregularities at Sino-Forest: that seemed to me to be something that was something that was already well priced in. Irregularities? File that one under “No shit, Sherlock.” The OSC did NOT say that Sino-Forest was an outright fraud that was worth $0 per share.
Well anyway, I am no longer thinking about playing $SNOFF from the long side. Their latest announcement falls into the “You are completely full of sh!t” category, and puts me squarely in the “You-don’t-get-the-benefit-of-any-doubt” camp. I am now a full non-believer in Sino-Forest (although as I mentioned, I covered my short position). What changed? Read on:
Sino-Forest came out with a press release early Sunday morning, during a natural disaster. Their release included the claim:
“In addition, Sino-Forest has placed three employees on administrative leave, during which they have been relieved of their responsibilities but remain available to assist the Company if required. A fourth senior employee has been requested to act solely on the instructions of Mr. Martin to assist the Company in certain matters relating to the work of the Independent Committee and the continuing operations of the Company’s business. These actions were undertaken by the Company after certain information was uncovered during the course of the Independent Committee’s review, subsequent to the release of the Company’s second quarter financial results, and before the OSC’s cease trade order was issued.”
In other words: “we discovered this wrongdoing in our own internal investigation, BEFORE the OSC news annihilated our stock to the tune of 71% on Friday, and we have this under control and are addressing it.” To that I say: BULLSHIT.
If Sino-Forest had information from their Special Committee that there was evidence of fraud at the company, and they had placed 3 employees on administrative leave, that’s not the kind of thing that they can wait around until Sunday at 4am to release in a press release that they hoped would fly under the radar by some unseen miracle. They should have disclosed it as soon as it happened, or at the very least, disclosed it after the OSC’s blockbuster intervention.
For Sino-Forest to step in now and play the “oh, yeah, sure, we already were all over this” card is, well, as I mentioned in the title of this post: a load of crap.
If you disagree with me, please voice your logic in the comments.
-KD
disclosure: no positions in SNOFF
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
Recent Posts
- Whitney Tilson’s Non-Confirmation Bias – The Barnes and Noble Jackpot
- Quality Posts
- Was Las Vegas Sands’ Earnings Beat Due To Good Luck?
- Las Vegas (Is Only A Teeny Part of Our Business) Sands Q1 Earnings Report
- Chesapeake Tries The “That Was Not Intended To Be A Factual Statement” Defense
- Trading Rule #2: Know Why You’re In A Trade
- Who Should I Go See At Jazzfest?
- Prisoner’s Dilemma: Game Theory Peace Through Superior Firepower
- Quality One Direction Parody
- Trading Rule # 1: Know What You Don’t Know
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-