Dow Jones Industrial Average Is a Horribly Constructed Index
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on February 9th, 2012
I hate the Dow. There’s a reason: it’s an idiot’s index. I don’t mean to insult anyone, it’s just that you have to understand how the Dow index is actually constructed – and once you understand it, you should agree “wow, that’s asinine.”
The New York Times’ Adam Davidson gets into it a little bit in his piece “Why do we still care about the Dow?“ But it’s really simple: the Dow is a price weighted index. That means that the index “holds” the same number of shares of each stock, and that the index components with higher prices have higher weights. Since stock price is essentially a random number – in the sense that companies can change their stock price without changing the value of their company by splitting or reverse-splitting their shares – this is an utterly absurd way to create an index.
Who would ever create a portfolio like that? When you trade/invest/whatever, you don’t buy the same number of shares of each stock. You might weight your portfolio by dollar value, by volatility risk, by some sort of risk-weighted metric, by market cap, by earnings multiples, by geographical location, by sector – anything but equal share counts.
The Dow is such a ludicrous index that when one of the Dow components splits, indexers must sell shares of that component and buy shares of all of the other components with the proceeds. Moronic.
Why, then, is The Dow the favorite of the retail market? Well, tradition first and foremost – that’s the way it was back in the day, and the status quo is a driving force. Secondly, stocks are correlated, especially the type of large cap stocks that make up the Dow and account for much of the weight of the S&P 500. Even with the insane price weighting methodology, the Dow’s performance has been highly correlated to the S&P 500.
In some sense, it’s dumb luck – the Dow has succeeded IN SPITE of its construction, not because of it. Maybe there’s a lesson here after all: in a market like this, it doesn’t really matter how you weight your portfolio*…
-KD
disclosure: no positions in $DIA
* it should be clear from my use of the words “moronic,” “asinine,” and “idiotic” that I am not suggesting that anyone weight their portfolio like the Dow is weighted.
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
If you'd like to make a donation, I always appreciate it:
I'm also a member of the Amazon.com Affiliate program. -
Recent Posts
- The Oral History of the 2003 World Series of Poker
- Kmart Viral Video – Big Gas Savings
- Amazon – A Logistics Story
- Senate Subcommittee Hearings on Apple’s Taxes – Grandstanding Dbags
- HomeBrew Batch #29 – Mustard Brown Ale
- The Most Exciting 8 Seconds of My Night
- The Kid’s Still Got It
- Is Anyone Surprised That Fish McBites Suck?
- Poker and Trading – Birds of a Feather
- Matt Kemp: Respect
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-
