Diamonds Are an ETF’s Best Friend?
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on March 7th, 2012
Thanks to Olivier Ludwig at IndexUniverse for a heads up about IndexIQ’s planned Physical Diamond Trust ETF (and to Tadas @ Abnormal Returns for this post title). The SEC filing is here, and there are some interesting tidbits.
First of all, any young man who has shopped for a diamond engagement ring for the lady of his dreams knows about the 4 Cs: Cut, Clarity, Carat, Color. Diamonds vary in characteristics, and are judged subjectively, although there certainly is a rigorous standard. I used to live in NYC, where everyone had a “diamond guy.” Every diamond shopper should experience the Diamond Gypsies of West 47th Street at least once – going from room to room up sets of stairs, behind bulletproof doors, down into boiler rooms – to see the incredibly segmented division of labor in the heart of the diamond district. You talk to one guy about the stone. Another guy does the setting. Then they walk you over to the guy who does the polishing – and none of these little “shops” look like Tiffany’s: they are literally dilapidated closets hidden all over big buildings. I swear the “polishing guy” was in an old janitor’s closet, but man was that ring spotless when he was done with it
But I digress – back to the S-1. As regular readers know, ETFs have “creation baskets” which may be exchanged or redeemed for shares in the underlying trust. With the $SPY, if you deliver the right basket of S&P 500 stocks to the Trust, they give you new SPY shares. If you deliver SPY shares to the trust, they give you a basket of underlying stocks. Well, the Diamond ETF (I want to call it DMND but that ticker is taken!) does the same thing. They will have creation baskets made up a variety of physical diamonds – they call them “diamond parcels.” The details aren’t exact yet, bu it seems that the basket will be a diverse incorporation of diamonds with different 4C characteristics (ie, 25% G/VS1, 25% F/VS2, etc). As the S-1 explains:
“Each Diamond Parcel is comprised of [__] diamonds, including that proportion of Subcategory [_], Subcategory [_] and Subcategory [_] diamonds that is in agreement with the Diamond Ratio. At the initial date of deposit, delivery of [_] Diamond Parcels is required for the creation of one Basket.”
It’s the process that I find especially interesting/troubling:
“Each diamond delivered to the Trust in satisfaction of a creation order must be accompanied by a GIA Certification that such diamond meets the Required Delivery Standards of the relevant Subcategory and that it is (i) a mined, natural stone and (ii) not a “conflict diamond”, as defined pursuant to the Kimberley Process. The GIA Certification for each diamond must be dated after January 1, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the Custody Agreements, a GIA Graduate Gemologist employed or otherwise engaged by the Custodian shall verify the specifications and GIA Certification of each diamond prior to its receipt or transfer as part of a creation order or redemption order, respectively.”
Now what that says is that not only will each diamond be accompanied by its GIA Grading Certificate – each diamond will also be graded by a GIA Gemologist to verify the quality. For every diamond. In each creation/redemption order.
It seems that this procedure isn’t so feasible for large creations/redemptions of diamonds. I guess that having each diamond re-examined can theoretically decrease issues with variance in the initial grading certs, but it also opens up areas for potential issues with subjective grading by the reviewing gemologist, or for fraudulent certifications.
I have my doubts that this product is going to take off – logistical concerns and technical limitations regarding the handling and verification of diamonds in large volumes make me suspect that you won’t see hundreds of millions of dollars in this Trust. Then again, I am positively not a diamond expert, and maybe there’s something I’m missing: maybe the Diamond ETF will be the panacea that the diamond industry has been waiting for. I tend to doubt it…
Finally, readers should have no confusion with $DIA – the Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF which is also known as “Diamonds.”
related:
Index Universe: IndexIQ Plans Physically Backed Diamond ETF
SEC: IndexIQ S-1 Filing
-KD
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
If you'd like to make a donation, I always appreciate it:
I'm also a member of the Amazon.com Affiliate program. -
Recent Posts
- Amazon – A Logistics Story
- Senate Subcommittee Hearings on Apple’s Taxes – Grandstanding Dbags
- HomeBrew Batch #29 – Mustard Brown Ale
- The Most Exciting 8 Seconds of My Night
- The Kid’s Still Got It
- Is Anyone Surprised That Fish McBites Suck?
- Poker and Trading – Birds of a Feather
- Matt Kemp: Respect
- The Difference Between Women and Men: Dog Poop Edition
- You Can Not Make This Stuff Up
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-