Dept of Justice Calls Full Tilt Poker “A Global Ponzi Scheme”
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on September 20th, 2011
via the WSJ:
“Full Tilt was not a legitimate poker company, but a global Ponzi scheme,” said Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District, in a statement. “
“Federal prosecutors in Manhattan said on Tuesday they were filing legal papers as part of a civil money laundering complaint that alleged Full Tilt Poker improperly used funds of online poker players to pay members of its board of directors, including famous poker players Howard Lederer and Christopher “Jesus” Ferguson, $440 million since April 2007.”
Unreal. What blows my mind about this is that online poker is ALREADY a tremendous business model. Customers deposit money and play against each other, with “the house” – FullTilt Poker in this case – taking a tiny cut of each hand played. The business is easily scalable, and once it’s up and running it becomes a money printing machine. Customer funds flow around a virtual whirlpool, with little bits constantly leaking out into the coffers of The House – LEGALLY! The House doesn’t have to steal the money – they get it in the end anyway! If you don’t like the whirlpool analogy, imagine an old-school hourglass. The sand inside the top of the hourglass is the sum of customer funds, and it’s constantly trickling into the bottom: the House accounts – as the customers pay “rake” for every hand they play.
It boggles my mind that FullTilt would steal from their players when they already had one of the most tremendous business models on the planet.
EDIT: via Paul Kedrosky, an amazing excerpt from the complaint, emphasis mine:
“As described more fully below, in or about thesummer of 2010, Full Tilt Poker’s payment processing channels were so disrupted that the company faced increasing difficulty attempting to collect funds from players in the United States.Rather than disclose this fact, Full Tilt Poker simply credited players’ online gambling accounts with money that had never actually been collected from the players’ bank accounts. FullTilt Poker allowed players to gamble with — and lose to other players — this phantom money that Full Tilt Poker never actually collected or possessed. When other players won these phantomfunds, their accounts were credited with money that Full Tilt Poker did not actually possess, but now nevertheless owed to these players. As a result, Full Tilt Poker soon developed a massive shortfall between the money owed to United States players and the money actually collected from United States players, with Full Tilt Poker having credited approximately $130 million in phantom money to U.S. players’ online accounts that was never actually collected from players’ bank accounts. Full Tilt Poker never disclosed this shortfall to the public.”
previously:
2) You’re Gonna Get Your Online Poker Funds Back. (ummm – at least, the Government won’t confiscate them… but if the company stole them, you might not get them back
-KD
disclosures: I own shares in $PYGMF : the U.S. Pink Sheet stock of BPTY.L: Betwin.Party Digital Entertainment. I never had money at FullTilt Poker. I had money at Pokerstars, which was returned to me upon request after the Online Poker D-Day.
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
Recent Posts
- Was Las Vegas Sands’ Earnings Beat Due To Good Luck?
- Las Vegas (Is Only A Teeny Part of Our Business) Sands Q1 Earnings Report
- Chesapeake Tries The “That Was Not Intended To Be A Factual Statement” Defense
- Trading Rule #2: Know Why You’re In A Trade
- Who Should I Go See At Jazzfest?
- Prisoner’s Dilemma: Game Theory Peace Through Superior Firepower
- Quality One Direction Parody
- Trading Rule # 1: Know What You Don’t Know
- Calling Natural Gas Experts – Let’s Find a Trade Here
- Chesapeake’s Response is Douchetastic Legalese
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-