Banks Dividends Are Coming Back – How Will The Fed Pull This Off?
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on March 18th, 2011
The Fed announced today:
“The Federal Reserve on Friday announced it has completed the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), its cross-institution study of the capital plans of the 19 largest U.S. bank holding companies.
As a result of the CCAR, some firms are expected to increase or restart dividend payments, buy back shares, or repay government capital. The Federal Reserve on Friday will discuss the reviews and its decisions with firms that requested a capital action. All 19 firms will receive more detailed assessments of their capital planning processes next month.”
Now here’s what I’m wondering: Remember what some banks claimed with TARP – that they didn’t “need” the money, but rather, that the Government made them take it, because, after all, if only the sick firms had gotten funds, then everyone knows that they are sick! Now, let’s ignore the fact that some of the TARP recipients took the “we didn’t want the money, they made us take it,” line. With this dividend resumption, we’re gonna get a pretty good idea at who got the green light and who got the red light to resume dividend repayments!
How will the market react when it sees which banks do not resume dividend payments? Is there any other conclusion except for “The Fed thought you weren’t sound enough to give capital to shareholders” ??? Of course, the Fed addressed this:
“It is important to note that there are a number of reasons why firms participating in the CCAR may not be making capital distributions this quarter. For example, a firm may not have requested approval of any such action, Federal Reserve supervisors may have believed a requested distribution was too high at this time and could weaken the firm’s ability to weather adverse economic conditions, or supervisors may not have been comfortable with the capital planning process underlying the request. Firms may resubmit capital proposals each quarter, with their prospects for an answer of no objection dependent on their responses to any concerns raised during the CCAR.”
I’m skeptical that this “explanation” will suffice. It seems likely to me that Mr. Market will draw its own conclusions. In other words, any bank that doesn’t increase its dividend or buyback stock will be assumed to have “failed” the test. The Fed is trying another angle, too, from the detailed report:
“In contrast to the 2009 SCAP, the Federal Reserve does not intend to disclose any firm specific results of the CCAR”
I don’t know if that means they will not be giving out the details of the stress tests for each bank, or that they will not be releasing a public list of who “passed,” or both. As I mentioned above, I don’t see how they can say “Banks X,Y, Z were approved for capital distributions, and banks A,B,C were denied,” without Mr. Market drawing conclusions about the adequacy of capital at the banks that were denied. The Fed’s paper has all sorts of disclaimers regarding this – elaborating on the quote above, about why firms may be denied in their requests, and how not all firms even submitted requests – but in my opinion, the results will speak for themselves.
The Fed will notify the individual banks of the results by March 21st. This should be interesting. I mean, if GS (for example) puts out a press release about raising their dividend, and MS puts out a press release about raising their dividend, won’t people worry why the other guys are NOT upping their dividends?
Let’s see how this one plays out…
-KD
Kid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
This blog has morphed from a discussion of poker hands and theory into an evaluation of financial markets from the point of view of a former trader. More » -
Recent Posts
- “They Call Me Adam Yauch But I’m MCA”
- Jimmy Kimmel vs Barack Obama
- Trading Rule #4 – Learn To Take Losses
- Double Pepper Saison – Homebrew Batch 12
- Trading Rule #3: Understand the Product You Are Trading
- On Einhorn and Herbalife
- Where My Neighbor’s Dog Kills Two Of My Chickens
- Whitney Tilson’s Non-Confirmation Bias – The Barnes and Noble Jackpot
- Quality Posts
- Was Las Vegas Sands’ Earnings Beat Due To Good Luck?
-
-
Categories
-
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- February 2001
-